I'm in the process of creating the demo for an upcoming video on a 1974 Fender Twin Reverb. This is the point where I'm editing the video and audio layers all together with green screening. The studio-captured audio is not added yet. This is just a rough video mix with the RAW camera guide audio for the drums and guitar ONLY! So this is what the drums and rhythm guitar are sounding like in the room by themselves with no close miking and no post processing (other than a bit of compression and EQ). I am actually kind of shocked how good this is sounding even though one of the camera mics (the one for the drums) is from a DJI Action Cam and the other (for the guitar) is a Panasonic camcorder mic. Usually when making this kind of demo, the raw camera mic audio acts as a guide when lining up video clips on the editing timeline and then gets deleted from the final timeline before publishing. In some cases, I will even mix in a hint of the raw camera microphones with the studio mix to give ...
This little tuner does more than just tune, and I think they're going to sell a million of these damn things.
This company sent me a 2.4ghz wireless in ear monitor system for review. The results were less than stellar. The dropouts were so bad on certain channels, I couldn't make it even 5 feet without severe dropouts! If you're in the market for wireless in ears, be sure to do your research and spend a long time looking at the available broadcasting frequencies and their drawbacks. From what I can see, 2.4ghz is NOT RELIABLE for anything to do with live performing. Many systems employ a sophisticated channel-jumping method to get around the crowded channels, but will still see dropouts.
